Skip to content
All teams
GRA

2025–26 season

Grambling

Tigers · SWAC

Compare in Matchup Lab
Record
14–19
Unranked in the AP poll
Projected seed
Out
Outside the projected field
Efficiency
-9.7
No. 297 in Division I
Home
Grambling, LA
6,015 mi from Indianapolis
National titles
0
Still chasing the first

Statistical profile

Percentiles compare this team with all 365 Division I teams. 100th is best in every row, including defense, where lower raw numbers are better: green bars are the top of the country, red the bottom, blue a style (pace, three-point rate) rather than a strength. Season totals include tournament games.

Efficiency

Offensive efficiency96.7
6th
Defensive efficiency109.3
51st
Efficiency margin-12.6
18th
Pace64.4
10th
Strength of schedule-11.3
3rd

Scoring & shooting

Points per game70.3
17th
Points allowed70.1
81st
Field goal %43.0%
18th
Three-point %31.8%
18th
Three-point rate38.0%
42nd
Free throw %73.2%
57th

Possessions

Rebounds per game33.5
25th
Offensive rebound %30.8%
53rd
Defensive rebound %68.6%
35th
Assists per game12.0
14th
Turnovers per game14.6
3rd
Turnover rate23.0%
1st

Defense & roster

Steals per game8.1
88th
Blocks per game2.9
28th
Opponent 3P %32.1%
78th
Average heightNaN′NaN″
—
Program experienceNaN yrs
—
Bench pointsNaN
—

Strengths and weaknesses

Flagged automatically when a stat sits in the top or bottom 15% of all 365 Division I teams.

  • WeaknessTurnover-proneTurnover rate: 23.0%1st
  • WeaknessSoft scheduleStrength of schedule: -11.33rd
  • WeaknessStruggling offenseOffensive efficiency: 96.76th
  • StrengthGrinds the pace downPace: 64.410th

Tournament history

Every NCAA tournament appearance since 2002, with who Grambling beat and who ended the run.

Appearances

1

Record

1–1

Sweet 16s

0

Final Fours

0

Titles

0

  1. 202416Round of 64Beat 16 Montana St. Lost to 1 Purdue 78–50. Bracket

Roster

Season per-game stats for every player who appeared.

Player data arrives with the stats provider

Rosters and per-player stats come from a licensed source so names and numbers are matched correctly. We don't show placeholder players for real teams.

Season schedule

Every game with consensus closing lines (median across sportsbooks) and against-the-spread results.

ATS overall

15–16

ATS as favorite

7–9

ATS as underdog

8–7

ATS neutral court

3–1

ATS vs. tournament teams

3–3

ATS vs. ranked teams

0–1

Over / under

10–21

14–19 in 33 games
Season schedule and results
DateOpponentResultSpreadTotalATSO/U
Nov 3vsHUSHuston-TillotsonW91–47————
Nov 6@ISU#6Iowa State2L62–102+33.5142.5MissOver
Nov 9@HOWHoward16W73–70+4.75153.75CoverUnder
Nov 13vsSOUSouthern MissW75–70-2.25148.5CoverUnder
Nov 18@SANSan DiegoL68–78+6.5149MissUnder
Nov 21@CBUCalifornia Baptist13L59–72+14.25144.75CoverUnder
Nov 24@UC UC RiversideL74–83+4144.5MissOver
Dec 2@TULTulaneL63–65+12.25150CoverUnder
Dec 8@SOUSouthern MissL60–68+8.5142.25CoverUnder
Dec 18NNORNorfolk StateW80–68+1.5135.5CoverOver
Dec 19NHAMHamptonW81–72+1.5138.5CoverOver
Dec 23@OSUOhio State8L63–89+28.5153.5CoverUnder
Dec 30vsCENCentenary (LA)W90–58————
Jan 3vsPVPrairie View A&M16W76–72-7.75155.5MissUnder
Jan 5vsTEXTexas SouthernW84–67-5.5145.5CoverOver
Jan 10@BETBethune-CookmanL65–74+3.75144.75MissUnder
Jan 12@FLOFlorida A&ML84–91-1.5141.5MissOver
Jan 17vsSOUSouthernL53–71-1.5152.5MissUnder
Jan 31@JACJackson StateW69–66-2.75148.75CoverUnder
Feb 2@ALCAlcorn StateW74–50-5143.75CoverUnder
Feb 4vsARPArkansas-Pine BluffL64–67-6.25145.25MissUnder
Feb 7vsALAAlabama StateW57–47-5.25144.75CoverUnder
Feb 9vsALAAlabama A&ML58–66-4.5135.75MissUnder
Feb 14@TEXTexas SouthernL79–82+1.25139.75MissOver
Feb 16@PVPrairie View A&M16L63–68-2.5151.75MissUnder
Feb 21@SOUSouthernL73–87+5.5142.75MissOver
Feb 23vsMISMississippi Valley StateW83–62-16.5137CoverOver
Feb 26vsBETBethune-CookmanL71–76-0.25145MissOver
Feb 28vsFLOFlorida A&ML59–66-5140.75MissUnder
Mar 3@ALAAlabama A&ML63–77+1.75140.25MissUnder
Mar 5@ALAAlabama StateW65–63+2.5145CoverUnder
Mar 9NMISMississippi Valley StateW77–52-13.5136.25CoverUnder
Mar 10NJACJackson StateL65–68-6.75140MissUnder