Skip to content
All teams
BIN

2025–26 season

Binghamton

Bearcats · Am. East

Compare in Matchup Lab
Record
8–23
Unranked in the AP poll
Projected seed
Out
Outside the projected field
Efficiency
-21.0
No. 334 in Division I
Home
Binghamton, NY
6,015 mi from Indianapolis
National titles
0
Still chasing the first

Statistical profile

Percentiles compare this team with all 345 Division I teams. 100th is best in every row, including defense, where lower raw numbers are better: green bars are the top of the country, red the bottom, blue a style (pace, three-point rate) rather than a strength. Season totals include tournament games.

Efficiency

Offensive efficiency96.9
6th
Defensive efficiency123.7
2nd
Efficiency margin-26.8
1st
Pace64.6
12th
Strength of schedule-12.7
1st

Scoring & shooting

Points per game67.9
8th
Points allowed74.9
43rd
Field goal %45.9%
63rd
Three-point %32.7%
29th
Three-point rate31.8%
9th
Free throw %74.5%
73rd

Possessions

Rebounds per game31.3
7th
Offensive rebound %21.4%
1st
Defensive rebound %71.0%
74th
Assists per game11.7
9th
Turnovers per game12.3
27th
Turnover rate19.0%
15th

Defense & roster

Steals per game5.2
9th
Blocks per game3.0
34th
Opponent 3P %35.7%
15th
Average heightNaN′NaN″
—
Program experienceNaN yrs
—
Bench pointsNaN
—

Strengths and weaknesses

Flagged automatically when a stat sits in the top or bottom 15% of all 345 Division I teams.

  • WeaknessSoft scheduleStrength of schedule: -12.71st
  • WeaknessFew second chancesOffensive rebound %: 21.4%1st
  • WeaknessLeaky defenseDefensive efficiency: 123.72nd
  • WeaknessStruggling offenseOffensive efficiency: 96.96th
  • WeaknessRarely shoots threesThree-point rate: 31.8%9th
  • StrengthGrinds the pace downPace: 64.612th
  • WeaknessTurnover-proneTurnover rate: 19.0%15th

Tournament history

Every NCAA tournament appearance since 2002, with who Binghamton beat and who ended the run.

Appearances

1

Record

0–1

Sweet 16s

0

Final Fours

0

Titles

0

  1. 200915Round of 64Lost to 2 Duke 86–62. Bracket

Roster

Season per-game stats for every player who appeared.

Player data arrives with the stats provider

Rosters and per-player stats come from a licensed source so names and numbers are matched correctly. We don't show placeholder players for real teams.

Season schedule

Every game with consensus closing lines (median across sportsbooks) and against-the-spread results.

ATS overall

13–14–1

ATS as favorite

0–3

ATS as underdog

13–11–1

ATS neutral court

0–1

ATS vs. tournament teams

1–2

ATS vs. ranked teams

0–0

Over / under

16–12

8–23 in 31 games
Season schedule and results
DateOpponentResultSpreadTotalATSO/U
Nov 3@SYRSyracuseL47–85+21.5153.5MissUnder
Nov 5vsRITRITW66–56————
Nov 8vsNIANiagaraL59–67-3.25139.5MissUnder
Nov 12@GEOGeorgetownL70–83+27.5141.5CoverOver
Nov 15@longwoodL82–90+15.25147.5CoverOver
Nov 19vsMISMisericordiaW69–58————
Nov 22NMD Maryland Eastern ShoreL52–63-6.5125.5MissUnder
Nov 23@CANCanisiusL66–75+2.25129.75MissOver
Dec 2vsLEHLehigh16W80–71OT+3.5139.5CoverOver
Dec 6vsle-moyneL63–78+2.5144.75MissUnder
Dec 13vsC CCentral ConnecticutL67–84+7.75133.75MissOver
Dec 17@PITTPittsburghL63–103+24.5134.5MissOver
Dec 20@mercyhurstL61–82+8132.5MissOver
Dec 23@ARMYArmyL85–95OT+11.5140CoverOver
Dec 29vsELMElmiraW100–60————
Jan 3vsNJITNJITL65–73-3.25140.5MissUnder
Jan 8@VERVermontL59–60+20.25141CoverUnder
Jan 10vsUMAUMass LowellL68–73+6.25147CoverUnder
Jan 15@UALUAlbanyL53–69+7.5138.5MissUnder
Jan 19vsUMBCUMBC16L60–78+5.5140.5MissUnder
Jan 22@NEWNew HampshireL82–88OT+9.75136.25CoverOver
Jan 24@MAIMaineL63–79+6.25124.25MissOver
Jan 29vsBRYBryantW63–60+2.25130.5CoverUnder
Feb 5@UMBCUMBC16L62–79+11.5138.5MissOver
Feb 7@NJITNJITL64–73+9140.5PushUnder
Feb 12vsVERVermontL65–73+11.75135.75CoverOver
Feb 14vsUALUAlbanyL74–77+4.5136.5CoverOver
Feb 19@BRYBryantW79–67+5134.5CoverOver
Feb 21@UMAUMass LowellL79–92+10146.5MissOver
Feb 26vsNEWNew HampshireW65–63+2.75141.5CoverUnder
Feb 28vsMAIMaineW74–67+0.25133.5CoverOver